|
ArtificialCleverenAI (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I can't believe her credentials. This is just embarrassing. She's apparently joined up with the known fraudster "UFO on a string" John Hutchinson to formulate WTC destruction theories.
BrodyLuv2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The Buildings could have been destroyed by resonating frequencies...As far as im aware HAARP has the ability to generate(harvest) and focus the energys required to resonate the buildings to the point of "Dustification"...they utilise upto 1 Billion watts of radio-waves, and its possible to vibrate an object to pieces by first finding an objects oscelation maximum and then simply applying the correct frequency.And also a 767 cannot fly at 500mph at those heights andnot come apart 4the same reason
ctasker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think the main point wood is trying to make is that there is not a "significant" amount of debris either falling or on the ground afterwards RELATIVE to the size and mass of what was there before. Getting hung up on her throwaway line about pennys falling is a cheap shot and doesn't address the core point that the vast majority of the building was pulverized into very fine powder for miles around or as the satellite photos shown on her website illustrate went into the upper atmosphere.
naard (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
she doesn't strike me as a scientist...
naard (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is a very interesting thought, and explains nicely a lot of the things i have seen people do which are otherwise inexplicable.
thanks for the brain-snack.
blastingcaps (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
thats chomsky in a wig!
SNIPERATWORK100 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
structural engineer my bollocks more like a nut job she found her phd in a lucky bag
DStyle86 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thanks, I'm always happy to add some ignorant idiots living in denial to my block list.
unclesamsnephew666 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"MYTH BUSTED - DISINFORMATION EXPOSED
ENERGY WEAPONS ARE AN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE CREDIBILITY OF 9/11-TRUTH"
no, they're an even more ridiculous explanation than the multiple absurdities of the 911truthtard (bowel) movement.
but at least it's original!
Kenzofeis (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The connection between her and the childish conman Hutchison became clear.
But, it may be, that her assignment is to ridicule the whole idea by being ... very inarticulate and clumsy and vague, just like Hutchison..
Clowns |
