|
lostangel912 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
My professor was involved in one of these experiments I believe. John Yeomans
ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
LMFAO
ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Are you retarded or have you not had a chem/bio class from a respected university?"
Yes, I have studied chem/bio.
"Photons are just a theory."
WRONG!
"If you would change your TV from cartoons to the history channel you would have seen stephen hawking's documentary and the historical biblical events that there is evidence that actually happened."
So then answer the fucking question!
SpydermanGST (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Look kid, finals are coming up at Johns Hopkins and I don't have time to keep on disproving and making you look like a complete dumbass. I hope you enjoy the rest of your high school years. BTW dont' work too hard at your McDonalds employee job :)
SpydermanGST (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Are you retarded or have you not had a chem/bio class from a respected university? Photons are just a theory. Do you know why? Because it's something theoretical, it's not something asbolute and observable.
If you would change your TV from cartoons to the history channel you would have seen stephen hawking's documentary and the historical biblical events that there is evidence that actually happened.
Thank you for proving my point on your last comment that science is usually wrong :)
ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Most of our "scientific breakthroughs" have been disproved. Take Bohr's model of the atom. What is the scientific icon? A planetary model of the atom, when everyone knows that quantum mechanics disproves that THEORY of planetary orbiting of electrons. :)"
Yes, that's how science works: When someone comes up with a new theory that explains things better than an old one, or fills in some gaps, the old theory is appended to or replaced.
ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"You do realize that there is evidence (actual evidence not THEORETICAL calculations) of Biblical events that some scientists claim to be "coincidences.""
Show me. And explain how the hell some coincidences make your Judeochristian fairy tales trump science.
ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"others claim that light is charged electrons, some say they're both."
Now you don't even know what you're talking about.
"Ultimately we don't know shit about our universe."
No. We don't know *everything*, but that doesn't mean we don't know *anything*.
"Besides that we're the only intelligent life"
That we've found so far. And judging by present company, I wouldn't necessarily say that we're intelligent.
"*gasp* doesn't that support the bible?"
No, see above.
ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"I love how you didn't mention anything about my comment on Stephen Hawking's statements."
I love how you think you commented on Stephen Hawking's statements.
"The calculations are bogus."
Okay, prove it.
"You do realize that we don't even know what light is right?"
Yes we do. Photons.
"THEORIES claim that it's just waves"
No, science currently understands it as demonstrating wave-particle duality.
SpydermanGST (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You do realize that there is evidence (actual evidence not THEORETICAL calculations) of Biblical events that some scientists claim to be "coincidences."
Most of our "scientific breakthroughs" have been disproved. Take Bohr's model of the atom. What is the scientific icon? A planetary model of the atom, when everyone knows that quantum mechanics disproves that THEORY of planetary orbiting of electrons. :) |
