sbald82nd (September 4, 2008 at 7:40 pm)

The program, at some point in the later future, is inevitable. However, implementing that infrastructure in the time frame that we are saying and providing training with it is ridiculously expensive.

marineooo5 (September 4, 2008 at 1:17 am)

thats why not even a battalion gets it. they got to be a large spec op group in a sense.

IvanichVanya (August 24, 2008 at 7:23 pm)

it's not that easy and cool in real life. This FCS system is too expensive and it works only in local warfare.

assasin301 (August 20, 2008 at 5:33 pm)

the FCS ( Future Combat System ) is the perfeckt battle system for rangers

CommanderZune (August 1, 2008 at 5:58 am)

If you think about it enimes in the future will not stand a chance against our troops they will be more fierec than ever :)

Dogmeat7 (July 8, 2008 at 11:11 pm)

ya m-16 A3. certain guns are near repalcing it but. will see.

LoyalFalcon12 (July 1, 2008 at 6:17 pm)

This the future of combat right here, and the Army is doing a great job on it!!!! I love this. I can't wait to use it once I'm in the Army. The 360 controllers make it even better for controlling the robots since they're so simple to use. Awesome!

LoyalFalcon12 (July 1, 2008 at 6:15 pm)

PadawanOsswe, you're a fucking idiot. This saves lives, everyone I've talked to LOVES it. Everyone now is familiar with computer technology, and FCS is going to come about sooner or later. In reality, it's coming sooner, and we need it. I don't think they're checking their "e-mails" during incoming fire you fucking retard. I hate ingnorants like you. You'd rather save money than save lives. Join the Army before you start criticizing it.

0nkelD0kt0r (June 21, 2008 at 7:32 am)

but thats a combat situation of a asymetric war. how would it show if they fight to a nation which is as well equiped? it would be not really different to todays battles.

josephpa05 (June 15, 2008 at 12:17 am)

we still use the m 16?