Search:

article marketing marketing with articles affiliate marketing with articles article marketing network article writing article writing software travel article writing technical article writing

Colonizing The Moon

Article Marketing - Drive Traffic to Your Website
Article Marketing - Drive Traffic to Your Website Article Marketing - Drive Traffic to Your Website
Article Marketing - Drive Traffic to Your Website

The Vision for Space Exploration is the United States space policy announced on January 14, 2004 by U.S. President George W. Bush. It is seen as a response to the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, the state of human spaceflight at NASA, and a way to regain public enthusiasm for space exploration. The Vision calls for the space program to: Complete the International Space Station by 2010 Retire the Space Shuttle by 2010 Develop the Orion spacecraft (formerly known as the Crew Exploration Vehicle) by 2008, and conduct its first human spaceflight mission by 2014 Develop Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicles Explore the Moon with robotic spacecraft missions by 2008 and crewed missions by 2020 Explore Mars and other destinations with robotic and crewed missions When the Vision was announced in January 2004, the U.S. Congress and the scientific community gave it a mix of positive and negative reviews. For example, Rep. Dave Weldon (R-Fla.) said, "I think this is the best thing that has happened to the space program in decades," while physicist and outspoken manned spaceflight opponent Robert L. Park said that robotic spacecraft "are doing so well it's going to be hard to justify sending a human." Others, such as the Mars Society have argued that it makes more sense to avoid going back to the Moon and instead focus on going to Mars first. In a position paper issued by the National Space Society (NSS), a return to the Moon should be considered a high space program priority, in order to begin development of the knowledge and identification of the industries unique to the Moon. The NSS believes that the Moon may be a repository of the history and possible future of our planet, and that the six Apollo landings only scratched the surface of that treasure. According to NSS, the Moon's far side, permanently shielded from the noisy Earth, is an ideal site for future radio astronomy. Unique products may be producible in the nearly limitless extreme vacuum of the lunar surface, and the Moon's remoteness is the ultimate isolation for biologically hazardous experiments. Lunar resources include most if not all raw materials available on Earth. The Moon can serve as a proving ground for a wide range of space operations and processes, including developments toward In-Situ Resource Utilization or "living off the land" (i.e., self-sufficiency) for permanent human outposts. This has various benefits. Initial return missions as recently proposed by the U.S. President and NASA can be done through space operations using the existing launch infrastructure and assets developed by the shuttle and International Space Station programs, plus existing expendable launch vehicles, with a minimum of new research and development programs. The lessons learned from international cooperation during ISS construction and operations can be improved upon and extended to human missions to the Moon, Mars and elsewhere. Initial missions could place scientific equipment on the Moon and return samples from areas never explored, such as the polar regions. Extent of water and other volatiles important to lunar industrialization could be determined. As future reusable launch systems begin operations, reducing cost and enabling higher flight rates, Earth-Moon traffic can become routine. With humans on the Moon again, NASA's space activities would take on new vigor and public interest. Throughout much of 2004, it was unclear whether the U.S. Congress would be willing to approve and fund the Vision for Space Exploration. However, in November 2004, Congress passed an omnibus spending bill which gave NASA the $16.2 billion that President Bush had sought to kick-start the Vision. According to then-NASA chief Sean O'Keefe, that spending bill "was as strong an endorsement [of the space exploration vision] as any of us could have imagined." In 2005, Congress passed S.1281, the NASA Authorization act of 2005, which explicitly endorses the Vision. The current NASA Administrator, Michael Griffin, who took office in April 2005, is a big supporter of the Vision, but has also modified it somewhat, saying that he wants to reduce the four year gap between the retirement of the Space Shuttle and the first manned mission of the Crew Exploration Vehicle.

Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: April 13, 2007 at 1:19 am
Author: BrunoTheQuestionable

Length: 09:59
Rating: 4.76
Views: 196973

Tags: Base  Colonizing  Colony  Lunar  Moon  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

JackieMagenta (September 7, 2008 at 5:35 pm)
It's amazing how fast space exploration is coming. Especially how anyone can now pay to experience a few moments in space. Idc how amazing it is, I think I'll just stay on earth for the rest of my life :D There's too much on here to be explored instead of blasting off to Planet X.
Pikey1517 (September 6, 2008 at 11:42 am)
but isnt it easyer an cheaper just use the space shuttle even though it might take a few years to get the parts? Becuase the orian dismantles on every mission so they will have to keep making new orions?
RuneBA (September 6, 2008 at 9:31 am)
Wow cool completely forgot this movie was 10min long.
iPopcorn (September 5, 2008 at 3:10 pm)
damn god needs to start packing soon :D
DistracticusPrime (September 5, 2008 at 1:48 am)
That's not a bad question; lots of people ask the same thing. It's because some of the contractors are now defunct. Like the company that made the RCS hydrazine fuel tanks. It would take years to bid a new contractor, get the new parts built, inspected, and installed, and then the shuttle would be retired. So it's not worthwhile to replace the worn out parts.
Pikey1517 (September 4, 2008 at 4:18 pm)
why cant they replace those parts they're the ones who created them have they lost the technology or is it such a rare material that they can find?
Pikey1517 (September 4, 2008 at 4:17 pm)
its easyer just to make our own atmosphere
derekwerek (September 4, 2008 at 9:35 am)
As early as 2017, wow that's so early, yeh right
tyranusmaul (September 3, 2008 at 11:53 pm)
we'll dock each individual segment of the ring piece by piece it would take about 20 years probably, but they built the great pytrimid of Giza in 28 years, each piece would probably be about 10 billon dollars, but money isn't real the material to build each segment of earth (from the earth) is buld it on earth launch it to the orbit ket the moon catch it dock the segments together, in the somewhat cheesy sci-fi movie "Starship Troopers" there is a ring that i am considering around the moon
tyranusmaul (September 3, 2008 at 11:49 pm)
my idea is to build a ring around the moon for space docking stations, living enviornments, and fuel ports, it seems easy because the structures can be docked together piece by piece and they would stay there because they would be in the moon's gravitational pull,just like when we landed on the moon we detached our engines in the lunar orbit and went down to the surface in the lunar moduole, you fly back up to the engine that is still there in the gravitational orbit and redock

Article Marketing - Drive Traffic to Your Website © 2007 All Rights Reserved.