24562465245672456724 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

If it's true that 18 companies were involved in 'Google' Open Social, then why does it have to wear the name 'Google'. That is the question I had. Is Google ruling the standards of the internet ? But that is quite irrelevant from this video. I think it's good for seesmic to be joining in new technologies and opensocial is definitely something that would 'make the web better', and that is exactly what we need.

svnoptike (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

don't. i mean what are "you" [seesmic] ABOUT, really (?) — is, having all these useless, countless, qualitess, x-less... kind of [gadget/applications] just as in facebook all around seesmic, your goal, or is it any useful, does it bring anything (?) realy THINK about it. Plus monopolies are also a bad point,

deekdeekster (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i'm not that negative about Open Social - I am extremely wary of monopolies!

mindcaster (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

go for it, seesmic