leonkennedy74 (August 14, 2008 at 1:43 am)

wow this is incredible. love how it has kind of a jazzy feel to it but still remains true to the radiohead avant-garde sound.

ebutuvul (July 19, 2008 at 2:09 pm)

keith jarret is brad`s hero! no doubt about it..

fyrstm (July 16, 2008 at 8:49 pm)

There are good artist, there are fantastic artist. And then, there are Keith Jarret.

pjgrabowski (July 13, 2008 at 1:20 pm)

i think you are forgetting mccoy tyner

jazzmuziq (July 10, 2008 at 1:18 am)

krelianx, I completely agree with you. I really do love both artists. Keith because of his beautiful lyricism. He improvises as if playing a written out solo.. Very melodical and beutiful. Brad because of his technical, time, and rhythmic chops. He also plays very subtle and lyrical when it comes to ballads. His left hand counterlines and motific development and classical harmony is a very hip and sophisticated compbination.

sourmelk (July 8, 2008 at 6:32 am)

does anyone have the sheet music?! it would be greatly appreciated

Relvaceos (July 2, 2008 at 1:52 am)

no, I, for instance, like jarrett because he alone gives me the best trip of my life if i just close my eyes, on the dark, with high volume.

jacofanatic (June 27, 2008 at 6:59 am)

very well put. it takes awhile for Jarretts atonal work to grow on even the most sophisticated listener

Krelianx (June 27, 2008 at 6:41 am)

I am a big fan of both. Jarrett is darn untouchable when he devolves into lyrical improvisations (end of La Scala, Paris, Kyoto) or gospel-tinged groove (Koln, much of his trio). Mehldau's rythmic and harmonic work is far more advanced, and his left hand has indeed opened a dramatic space for improvisation. Some of Keith's atonal work in his Solos is deviant and boring, but it is occasionally very far left (see Tokyo 2002). Both are fantastic, and neither deserved disavowal.

musikzzzz (June 15, 2008 at 8:11 pm)

:-))